28
Novembre

Open letter about Notre-Dame-des-Landes to OECD Delegates for COP 21

Open letter

to OECD Delegates

for COP 21

Nantes, November 27th 2015

What is Notre Dame des Landes airport really about?

 

NDDL airport is not about law abiding and State authority.

 

NDDL airport is not, primarily, about Environment.

 

NDDL airport is not about a few “bourgeois” shocked by the behaviour of “zadistes”, a new species of hippies who occupy the site.

 

NDDL airport might well become yet another sad instance in a long list of white elephants which include Ciudad Real in Spain, closed after 3 years, or Montreal-Mirabel, abandoned after 22 years and which cost Quebec so dearly. The project clearly demonstrates a lack of awareness of the market forces: an airport does not create traffic just because it is there.

 

NDDL airport is the child of stubborn politicians, backed by servile civil servants who are not prepared to displease by issuing objective recommendations. Of course they will never accept any independent arbitration.

 

NDDL airport is the result of a culture of political correctness, an approach whereby any serious discussion over the issue is avoided, and whereby the incestuous relationship between the Government, top civil servants and heads of major companies generates inefficiency.

 

NDDL airport would mean pouring cement over 3000 acres of precious natural wetland, an area the same size as London Heathrow (Europe’s n°1 airport), in order to welcome one tenth of the passengers (i.e. 7 million passengers as opposed to 70 million).

 

NDDL airport is about a Prefect (government-appointed head of the “Région”) who killed the equally sensitive Toulouse airport project, originally initiated by right wing politicians. Today he is fighting the anti-NDDL lobby who are using precisely the same arguments he himself had used at the time.

 

NDDL airport is about a Right wing senator from Vendée who will see the dynamic network of business from southern Loire, become cut off from the new airport by the traffic jams on the river bridges, northbound mornings and southbound evenings. But, he hopes to be elected as the “Région” next president, he needs his Nantes allies and, together with them, he attacks the socialist Government for their lack of spine regarding NDDL, insisting that, his party, the Right wing, would go ahead.

 

NDDL airport is about sheer demagogy, seeking the vote of ordinary citizens, who in most cases confess their total ignorance on the subject, by playing on their local pride: “Why should western France not have its prestigious major international airport?”

 

NDDL airport is about lying on the costs involved. The estimated figure released in 2012 by VINCI, the contractor, was €450M. However, that was based on a capacity limited to 4 million passengers and with shortfalls of all sorts (runway, airbridges, etc.). The actual updated project, complete with necessary road and train connections and a new bridge on the Loire is probably worth several billion Euros.

 

NDDL airport means a lie regarding the existing Nantes Atlantique airport, which is far less busy than other similar single runway airports, catering up to 3 or 4 times more traffic, such as Geneva, San Diego or Lisbon. A category 4 European airport, it can easily and gradually be optimised and modernised on its existing site. The total cost would stand between €100M to €200M, as opposed to some €900M deemed necessary by officials (who include totally unnecessary land expansion).

 

NDDL airport means the forced stagnation of Nantes Atlantique. No effort has been spared, over the last fifteen years, to convince Nantes inhabitants that progress is just impossible. Actually, noise efficient descent patterns could easily be introduced, and this, combined with new generation aircraft, would mean a quick reduction of noise areas, in total contradiction with the official line of ever increasing noise levels. Around London or Paris airports, noise is diminishing year after year: 8 times fewer people are concerned by a given level of noise around London Heathrow, over 30 years, according to official British figures.

 

NDDL airport means the embarrassment of resurrecting a useless project dating back to the sixties, in the same year Paris welcomes thousands of guests, from all over the world, flying in to attend a major climate event: COP21- while the city is still unable to offer decent rail connections to Paris-CDG airport (which has been awaited for more than 40 years).

 

HURRAH to ambitious and competitive projects, benefiting travellers and taxpayers, based on existing demand and open debate.

 

We say NO to political face-saving stubbornness or voter-centric demagogy.

 

If the matter was not so serious, it might even be amusing:

 

  • To see the actual cost of building runways on deep muddy clay.
  • To stare at an empty state-of-the-art terminal when Marseilles or Bordeaux have built cheap and adequate terminals perfectly suited to the low-cost traffic, dominant in regional airports.
  • To witness the rage and frustration of all southern Loire voters compelled to drive through horribly congested bridges to get to the airport and back, mornings and evenings, at rush hour.
  • To count the days when fog on this spongy plateau will deny the use of the airport to low-cost, regional and charter aircraft for which low visibility landing is not an option.
  • To see passengers from Le Mans, Angers, Rennes or La Roche, who will have contributed to NDDL with their taxes, take high speed rail to Paris-CDG because the flight offer is still 10 to 20 times richer than in NDDL.

 

It is a pity for valuable birdlife around the well-known Lac de Grandlieu sanctuary, protected from construction by legal noise restrictions. Given the greed that some lobbies barely hide, the area will gradually be invaded and spoiled by extensive housing developments.

 

Jacques Bankir
Ex CEO of Regional Airline Company, Nantes

Thierry Masson
Airline pilot – member of a pilot collective

Jean-Marie Ravier
Engineer, business manager - Nantes

Françoise Verchère
Co-president of CeDpa (Collectif d’élu-e-s Doutant de la pertinence du projet d’aéroport)

Philippe Trotté
Vice-president of CeDpa

Dominique Fresneau
Co-president of ACIPA (Association Citoyenne Intercommunale des Populations concernées par le projet d’Aéroport)

Anne-Marie Chabod
Co-president of ACIPA

Christian Grisollet
Co-president of ACIPA

Sylvain Fresneau
President of ADECA (Association de Défense des Exploitants Concernés par l’Aéroport)

 

Copy to : Mrs Ségolène Royal, French Minister for Environment ; Mr Laurent Fabius, French Minister for Foreign Affairs

 

Link to the English version

12
Avril

Conclusions de la commission du dialogue - English version

Publié dans Divers
Transfer of Nantes-Atlantique Airport
Report of the Dialogue Commission
by Claude Chéreau, Claude Brévan and Rouchdy Kbaier
9 April 2013
 
 
Original: French
Original Address: http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/SC600413040916180-1.pdf
Move to : http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Le_rapport_de_la_commission_de_dialogue.pdf on 12th of April.
Full report: 64 pages
pages 58 to 64: Conclusions and Recommendations
 
 
Conclusions and Recommendations
 
 
1.  Air traffic growth at Nantes seems set to continue, albeit at a slower rate than over the past few years. Forecasts to 2030 are realistic, judging by growth over the past years, which has been faster than was only recently considered optimistic. The hypothesis of nine million passengers by 2050 is however more in the nature of an aim put forward for the purposes of calibrating a development project rather than a forecast, given the economic and social uncertainties over such a span of time.  If in the long run the project were ever to reach that number of passengers, an international airport in the West of France would not relieve air traffic at Charles-de-Gaulle Roissy, as some have stated, but would rather allow the « Grand Ouest » area to do away with the need to go through Paris to gain access to European as well as major French cities. This airport would represent the implementation of a decentralisation policy.
 
2.   The current airport could only accomodate significant growth in passenger numbers if large-scale and disruptive work were to be undertaken. Air traffic forecasts estimate a number of four million passengers by 2018-2020, which is equivalent to the saturation level estimated at the time of the public debate held for the existing terminal. Sucessive retrofits and extensions have not led to an improvement of its operations and have taken up a substantial amount of space while requiring an increased number of pathways and security areas. This possibility of a re-design was however one of the main arguments put forward by those opposing the transfer of the airport to a new location.
 
The commission recommends that Government services undertake a more in-depth evaluation of the Nantes-Atlantique retrofitting costs both with the current runway and with the runway orientation changed crosswise. This assessment would present the advantage of putting an end to sterile polemics, as it would be based on concrete and verifiable facts.  It could be carried out with the involvement of those opponents who would be prepared to have their data compared to such an estimation.
 
Moreover, beyond 55000 aircraft movements, the airport nuisance to the residents of Nantes would be excessive. The redesigning of Nantes-Atlantique does not therefore appear to the Comission to be a viable long-term solution.  Technically difficult and highly disruptive to local residents, this option would amount to a voluntary limitation of airport capacity, thereby preventing the amortization of the refurbishment costs which would be incurred for even a limited capacity increase. This option would be detrimental to the economic development of the region.
 
3.   Many questions remain as to the future development of the Nantes-Atlantique site.  It is essential to clarify the issue of its planning once the commercial airport is transfered away.
The Commission recommends the following:
 
-     Reach a decision quickly as to whether or not to preserve the runway for Airbus, and define the company's needs for expansion.
-    Specify the actual surface area that would made available by the airport transfer, as well as the use to which that area would be put. Theoretical figures have varied, from 252 hectares including 70 hectares to be integrated into an urban forest in the city, after clearing of the airport site, to a more reduced figure of 80 hectares more recently put forward.
-  In general terms, provide for public consultations on a comprehensive development project for these districts located in the South of the Nantes conurbation.
 
4.   The noise exposure maps for Nantes-Atlantique and Notre-Dame-des-Landes were established on assumptions that should be updated to take into account new aircraft movement forecasts as well as technical advances in aircraft design.
 
A draft noise exposure map has been developed for Nantes-Atlantique at the request of the Commission. Such a map should be developed for Notre-Dame-des-Landes as well. The Commission morevoer recommends that sound insulation grant schemes be liberally applied in proximity to the Notre-Dame-des-Landes airport, as noise is more sharply perceived in a quiet environment than in an urban setting which is already noisy.  The Commission moreover recommends that recreational aviation and sightseeing flights, which are very noisy, be entirely barred from the projected airport.
 
5.  The medium-term change of scale of the transfered airport, with a greater number of point-to-point connections to destinations with economic potential may represent an advantage for the competitiveness of the Loire and Bretagne regions by opening them up to areas outside France and attracting international business and tourism. Even though international traffic represents 50% of the total volume at Nantes-Atlantique, this airport lags behind in this respect, as it only offers 25 European destinations (not all of which are cities with economic potential), while Lyon offers 40. The Commission nevertheless emphasizes that while rapid and high-performance access without transit through Paris is a need for businesses, especially as regards the option of making return journeys in the same day, such access is nevertheless not sufficient.  Such an advantage would remain merely potential until such time as it could be realized within the framework of an export-oriented economy and with the establishment of international businesses in the region. Similar statements apply to the development of tourism or business travel originating outside the region.  Such travel could be boosted if direct connections were established to the capitals and major cities of Europe. These are not however the destinations currently being served by Nantes-Atlantique, as the focus is primarily on  purely holiday destinations.  Developing demand would also require active measures to promote the potential for tourism in the « Grand Ouest » region of France, knowledge of which is still quite limited abroad.
 
6.  The proliferation of airports in the Pays de la Loire and Bretagne regions was referred to on several occasions and attributed to poor air transport policies.  It would seem necessary to give some thought to the airport network in Western France in order to rationalize the high number of airports, many of which do not have the critical mass needed to operate financially independently or to provide regular services to a range of destinations. The future of Rennes St-Jacques airport was brought up several times, some believing it would eventually be closed, while others considered that it might be used for business travel and freight.  Amongst the many airports in the region, only Brest's future stands unchallenged, as that town is remote and therefore has its own catchment area for travel. The argument that airlines choose their own airports is a limited one: such freedom of choice should not prevent regions from possessing an airport with a sufficiently large number of potential users to provide a full offer of destinations.
 
7.  Access to the airport by public transportation is a topic that gave rise to many questions and much scepticism, and would warrant clarification.  While road access is established and provided for in the Déclaration d'utilité publique, uncertainties remain as regards access by public transportation.  The Nantes-to-Chateaubriand tram-train will begin operations in 2014, but there is no prospect or certainty whatsoever that the tram-train line to Notre-Dame-des-Landes will be built. This project was « associated » with the airport project when the public enquiry was held, and the Commission of Inquiry had emphasized the need to take resolute steps towards its implementation.  It would currently appear that assessments of the profitability of such an infrastructure have led to its being shelved altogether. Very firm committments on replacement options should be made and widely publicized. As to the Rennes-Nantes high-speed train connection, it is included in the National Transport Infrastructure Plan (SNIT) currently undergoing revision. If this project is indeed approved, it will nevertheless clearly only be built in a more distant future, given the scarceness of financial resources.  The impact of such a lengthy delay on the airport's prospects for growth should be assessed.
 
8.  The elected representatives of the Erdre et Gèvres municipalities (CCEG) informed the Commission that they were encountering difficulties with a projet which extended beyond the boundaries of their localities and seemed to enjoy a de facto status of extraterritoriality. The Commission deems it necessary for the conditions of establishment of the airport on the territory of Erdre et Gèvres and of the Pays de Blain to be determined without delay and to be subjected to a joint local development approach led by the local authorities directly concerned, in association with the large municipalities. It is the Commission's view that a dual approach should be adopted: the large municipalities along with the localities should be mobilized, and both should be involved upstream in the process, as early on as the preparation of the financial instruments to be mobilized within the framework of the future planning for the State/Region projects and the operational programs FEDER, FEADER, LEADER (2014 to 2020), amongst others.
 
9. The Commission furthermore believes that national and European financing should be leveraged for farmer-led projects, whose involvement should be sought as of the preparatory phase relating to the above financial instruments.
 
10. The sensitive nature of the environmental issues relating to the impact of the projected airport and of the accompanying road scheme on agricultural land as well as on the natural environment, wetlands, and protected species was emphasized by elected representatives, agricultural unions and nature protection organisations, all of whom communicated their concerns relating to the design and implementation of the compensatory measures proposed by the two project owners. The Commission recommends that the reports of the Task Force of Independent Scientific Experts and of the Agricultural Commission be carefully analysed before any decision is taken, and that the reasons guiding such a decision be explained to the public as clearly as possible. 
 
Whatever the outcome of this decision, the Commission is of the view that three elements must be significantly strengthened:
 
   information of and exchanges with the public in an approach based on transparency.
-   beyond the existing or planned follow-up structures, clearly expressed objectives for compensation should be established and accompanied by easily verifiable committments on the part of the projet owner and the State.
-   determination of the mechanism for public participation in implementing these measures.
 
11.  A Peri-urban Agricultural and Natural Protection Perimeter (PPEANP or PEAN) covering 19300 hectares was established and now constitutes a green belt which must be preserved exlusively for agricultural purposes for several decades. However, the Commission, having heard the concerns expressed by the farmers, questions this provision, which should not represent an excessive constraint to farmers, and recommends that it be made the subject of a plan of action.
 
12.  The Grand-Ouest airport [Notre-Dame-des-Landes] aims to be exemplary in environmenal terms.  While this aim seems to be met as regards the design of the building and of the airport facilities, it is not achieved in the very large scale consumption of nature areas and agricultural land. Given the importance of these two aspects, we believe a better balance should be struck between the interests of the project and the agricultural and environmental dimensions, even though this may slightly diminish the landscaping of the airport area.
 
To this end, it is essential to reduce as much as possible the area of surfaces to be sealed or otherwise removed from agricultural use.
 
Reduce the surface area of car parks by diminishing the average size of each parking slot and by increasing the proportion of parking spaces in vertical parking garages once requirements reach 7500 slots.
 
Set aside at a minimum 250 hectares of the land currently designated as « available for development » for a sufficient length of time to allow for the verification of the effectiveness of  compensatory measures established for the construction of the first phase of the project.
 
Reduce the surface area of land designated as « available for future development », as a 200-hectare business park is planned near the site and the Grand-Ouest airport [Notre-Dame-des-Landes] is not designed to process any major volume of freight.
 
Seek to leverage the value of any residual land of over one hectare in area.
 
Examine the option of moving the Eastern section of the road scheme as close as possible to the occupied sections of the concession area, including the possibility of abandoning the traffic calming road design.
 
 
Proposals of a more general nature:
 
13.  The matter of the disconnection of a main project from its ancillary projects is a problem which extends beyond the Grand-Ouest [Notre-Dame-des-Landes] airport project. It is the view of the Commission that comprehensive public debates should be held on the project as a whole, i.e. on the main project, its transportation access and any other ancillary projects, and that the respective project owners should, following these debates, state their intention either to implement, to amend, or to abandon these projects.
 
14.  With a view to informing the public as fully as possible, and in order to integrate the surface areas required for environmental compensation into the project at an early stage, i.e. as of the Déclaration d'utilité publique, it appears essential for the project owner to be able to evaluate these requirements so as to include them into the overall project cost/benefit analysis.
 
 
Signed:
Claude Brévan
Claude Chéreau
Rouchdy Kbaier
 
 
 
Thanks to @takammmo  for the translation

 

A propos

Association Citoyenne Intercommunale des Populations concernées par le projet d'Aéroport de Notre Dame des Landes Association luttant contre la création d'un autre aéroport à Nantes (Loire Atlantique), sur les communes de Notre Dame des Landes, Grandchamp des Fontaines, Vigneux de Bretagne et Treillières

Autocollant Acipa 2012 fond-gris

Rechercher...

Média sociaux

Retrouvez nous sur les réseaux sociaux.

Facebook Twitter RSS Vimeo

GPlus Flickr Blogger Picasa

Plan du site ↑